ROHDE TRIAL: PROSECUTION CLOSING ARGUMENTS
First image of Jason Rohde in court…
The Judge seems very uncertain of the state’s arguments thus far. She’s either being thorough or she’s still vacillating.
The prosecutor Louis van Niekerk reiterates [rightly] how the mosaic of evidence lines up.
End of morning session.
The afternoon sessions starts off with a gripe. Judge Salie-Hlophe raps Van Niekerk on the knuckles for producing a thesis, rather than heads of argument. Well, I hope Van der Spuy is listening; sounds like he was hoping to generate twice as much legal diarrhea.
Van Niekerk apologizes and gets going, jumping immediately from page 100 to 135.
Is Jason Rohde also following the commentary on Twitter?
Above image courtesy of Jenna Etheridge, who specially asked for it to be credited.
Good to see the cameraman in the afternoon session actually capturing some footage of the accused. Van Niekerk starts off with a reference to the mysterious diary. Was there or wasn’t there a diary?
The diary seems to be part of an effort by the defense to malign the cops for misplacing or losing evidence. It could be that Rohde himself secreted the diary away, and then blamed the cops for taking it, otherwise, why else would it even come up?
Besides the diary, her handbag also mysteriously disappeared. Odd, isn’t it? Also odd is that two attorneys associated with the Rohde case have been murdered during the course of the trial: Pete Mihalik and Noorudien Hassan.
Rohde claimed he had no idea how to open the hotel door, so he called reception to have a hotel maintenance dude open the door. If you were confronted with this, would you have no idea how to open it?
Personally I find this a less credible part of his whole case. In his own version he describes himself doing a half Ironman. In order to compete as a triathlete, you’d need a minimal level of back maintenance know-how. Allan keys and the like to adjust saddle height etc. Besides this, Rohde had worked in the past in an upholstery business. Is it really believable that he’d never picked up a screwdriver in his life?
The autopsy evidence in the Rohde case have some application in the Zahau and Watts cases respectively. How can one tell, definitively, that a victim has been manually strangled to death?
True to his word, the prosecutor has galloped through his summary, and is done after less than 50 minutes. The first session was three times as long. A little underwhelming, and unfortunate that it was long and that, as a result, it was rushed. The prosecutor must be disappointed. The defense has the advantage of hindsight to develop a short, concise, compelling, competing narrative. Which will be the more convincing? We’ll know tomorrow.
ROHDE TRIAL: DEFENSE CLOSING ARGUMENTS
The morning session kicks off in the spacious Court 1, the same court where the Van Breda case was heard in its entirety.
End of morning session.
No live coverage provided by TCRS of the afternoon session.