True Crime Analysis, Breakthroughs, Insights & Discussions Hosted by Bestselling Author Nick van der Leek

Kate McCann’s Interrogation in Pictures [September 6-7 2007]

The £20 million 2019 Netflix documentary reveals further bias in episode four, specifically the way the interrogations of the McCanns are depicted. They’re cruel, unfair and unsubstantive. The McCanns are victims. The media and the police are caricious, shallow and stupid.

Trust the PR consultant of the McCanns to recognise a media “sting” when she steps out into the throng ahead of the interrogation of her employer. The cops have set the media up ahead of the interrogations. How dishonest!

Fullscreen capture 20190420 101748Fullscreen capture 20190420 110541

Fullscreen capture 20190420 101759Fullscreen capture 20190420 101801Fullscreen capture 20190420 101806Fullscreen capture 20190420 101808

And the PR continued during the interrogations.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 105637Fullscreen capture 20190420 105641

But inside, Kate wasn’t quite as happy as the PR suggested.


Fullscreen capture 20190420 105818

Although the documentary tries to contradict Amaral’s version of the timeline of the interrogations [see screengrabs below], in Kate’s own account of the interrogation*, she was clearly angry, dismissive and even disrespectful of some of the questions asked of her, especially those related to the cadaver dog alerts.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 111714

Fullscreen capture 20190420 123843Fullscreen capture 20190420 123858Fullscreen capture 20190420 123855Fullscreen capture 20190420 123902Fullscreen capture 20190420 123904


While the interrogations were happening, Kate’s PR spokesman was on point saying how ridiculous and stupid they were.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 124904

Fullscreen capture 20190420 124909

Fullscreen capture 20190420 124927

There was one PR person for Kate on the first day, and another on the second. It appears the PR people had carefully color co-ordinated their outfits to reinforce whatever Kate or Gerry were wearing on the day – to show their support.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 105646Fullscreen capture 20190420 105649

In fact she came in on the one day with her sister in law [wearing a matching yellow blouse to go with the yellow Find Madeleine bracelet on her wrist], and Justine McGuiness in tow.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 101801

The next day with her sister in law [dressed in a blue shirt, matching her brother’s] and David Hughes, a different PR spokesman wearing a matching pink shirt [to go with Kate’s jersey, for the second interview.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 123632Fullscreen capture 20190420 123814

Episode four has Amaral claim the interrogation lasted only two hours, when other witnesses say it lasted much longer.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 105652

Fullscreen capture 20190420 105719Fullscreen capture 20190420 105714Fullscreen capture 20190420 105703

On September 6th, Kate arrived at the police station at around 14:30. The first interview started at 14:55, and ended at 00:40. The first first interview took around 9-10 hours.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 114206

Fullscreen capture 20190420 114633

So did Amaral lie about the interview only lasting two hours?

On September 7th Kate attended a second, much shorter interview. It started close to 12:00 and ended at 15:15. Much of that interview involved watching video footage [as described above] and then asking Kate to respond to parts of it. An argument could be made that while the footage was playing [about an hour’s worth], the interrogation itself was on pause.

During her second interview, Kate entered the interrogation room at 11:50 and the interview was done by 15:15.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 114016

Fullscreen capture 20190420 113902

This suggests the second interview on the second day was reasonably close to two hours, or five hours long if one adds the time Kate arrived [10:00] to the time she left. But Amaral’s suggestion that the interview was only two hours when in fact it was 11 hours is clearly selective and perhaps mischievous storytelling.

In the documentary, instead of directing any of the attention to the specifics of what was actually asked during these many hours, the focus instead is on the sentiment and physical condition of the poor parents. If anything the entire interrogation is ridiculed as ridiculous and ludicrous.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 101445Fullscreen capture 20190420 101450Fullscreen capture 20190420 101518

[Above]: The male voice doing the voiceover narration for the “distressing and ridiculous allegations” Kate faced that day is author Anthony Summers.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 101531Fullscreen capture 20190420 101540

For a true crime documentary spanning eight episodes, one would think the substance of the actual interrogations when they finally happened [four months after the incident] would be worth looking into. Instead, it’s all about how tiring, ludicrous and tiresome the police were, and how vindictive, nasty and opportunistic the media were. The refrain from the McCanns was the same default setting: what everyone should be doing is looking for Madeleine.

But if the police were asking questions about cadavers, blood, hiding evidence and concealing bodies, then their argument was about the opposite – why looking for Madeleine was pointless if she was dead. Instead of scoffing at the cops, the McCanns had an opportunity to convince them she was still alive.

Did they?

Shortly or immediately after Kate’s interrogation, she phoned Jon Corner, whom the documentary identifies as a “friend” of the McCanns. He wasn’t just a friend, he’s an independent film producer and an expert with digital video and imaging. Corner had been actively involved in the McCanns PR, even travelling to Praia da Luz to get the McCanns’ version of events in their own words.

Corner appears in the documentary saying that Kate discussed a plea deal the cops offered her.

Fullscreen capture 20190420 105825Fullscreen capture 20190420 105827

Since the interrogation itself and being made arguidos in the media spotlight presented a PR catastrophe for the McCanns [right then], did she really just call her film producer friend to talk about the merits of the interrogation? Or was there some urgent discussion about putting some face-saving PR footage into the media ASAP to put some positive spin on the optics? If so, we don’t know.

We do know the McCanns decamped out of Portugal a few hours after being interrogated, and held a massive press conference in front of their home a couple of days later, with their official PR man [Clarence Mitchell] freshly knighted, at their side, ready to take questions.

*Madeleine: Our daughter’s disappearance and the continuing search for bKate McCann

More: Kate McCann September 6 Police Statement – PJ Files

Kate McCann September 7 Police Statement – PJ Files

Gerry McCann September 7 Police Statement – PJ Files


  1. Sylvester

    I would have to read these interrogation statements over and over and take notes but some things stand out. Little things. The tea stain on Madeleine’s shirt. Why could Kate remark on this? Isn’t it similar to Patsy Ramsey commenting on awaking the morning of Dec. 26 the first thing she did was go down to the laundry room and handle a red jumpsuit JonBenet had worn previously and make note that it would have to go to the cleaners? It’s just a little odd, and might be just a distraction strategy, or it could be something more. Then making sure the Capol (sp) and other children’s medications were zipped up presumably so the children wouldn’t sleepwalk and get into them seems more like covering their tracks – making note several times that there was no lock on the patio door from the outside – but precautions would be taken to lock up the medicines. And most glaringly that Madeleine was sleepy or lethargic, and slept on her side that night. I think it likely she was sick – from something. Also the downplaying of the crying heard by a neighbor. She says it was the younger sibling, but then says she questions Madeleine about it and it wasn’t of any real concern to the child. Really? Small children don’t have very long memories, but if she did question her about it I would think it the other way around, that Madeleine was the one who brought it up to Kate, not the other way around.

    • nickvdl

      Well spotted. As soon as there’s a crime and a version of events includes doing laundry right in the middle of it, one’s ears ought to prick up. Why is someone washing clothes in the middle of people dying or disappearing?

  2. Sylvester

    Well put. It’s either to cover something up or serve as a distraction to those investigating.

  3. Sylvester

    There is something so very disturbing about this case. Richard D. Hall thinks Madeleine died long before their staged abduction, and that the McCann’s – one or either – might have signed her in to the Creche and then out when she was in fact, gone. Dead. That it would be highly inconvenient to have the twins at one Creche, pick them up and walk them all the way over to the second Creche and pick up Madeleine. Richard D. Hall discusses this in part 8 of his series. But how could she fall off a sofa and die? Even if unusually sleepy. Gerry mentions in his police interview that it was difficult for Kate to manage 3 little children. That Madeleine was given a “star” as reward if she stayed in bed at night (at home). Come on. I understand a doctor requires uninterrupted sleep, but then why have children? Children wake up for all sorts of reasons, nightmares, a wet bed, sickness. I’m being judgmental again, but if it’s all too much you hire help. So the elaborate coverup of an abduction says they were hiding something very significant, and that all or most of the nighttime checkups from the restaurant were all staged. Perhaps for more than one night. So macabre.

    • nickvdl

      What do you think? Dead before May 3rd?

  4. Sylvester

    Also Gerry says if the twins were overly sleepy the night of the “abduction” then perhaps the intruder gave them something! What a crock!

  5. Sylvester

    My intuition tells me yes, before May 3. However whoever’s watch it was on (I suspect Kate’s) the amount of guilt, strategy and energy that went into such an elaborate coverup seems to be more than an accidental overdose of Calpol then a dizzy fall down dark stairs. Because they likely continued to dose the twins afterward. Wouldn’t that give you pause? Like gee, that could happen again. Still, a fall down the stairs seems most likely, and if there was any blood, tucking her away behind the sofa could account for blood seeping there. I don’t buy sexual abuse. The McCann’s wouldn’t cover for someone else – so to my mind this happened with Kate. Then Gerry pulled in close and tight to protect her and them. The statement “we let her down” – how? By not watching her? – but then they weren’t watching the twins either.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *