TRUE CRIME ROCKET SCIENCE

True Crime Analysis, Breakthroughs, Insights & Discussions Hosted by Bestselling Author Nick van der Leek

Page 22 of 79

Madeleine McCann Media Coverage [Summer 2007]

The archive below* covers the period end-of-May to early-September 2007. Most of the archive below refers to coverage specifically relating to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. In some cases other references are also included to sketch the “zeitgeist” at the time.


30 May 2007

‘We want Maddy to be found… yesterday’

31 May 2007

Are the McCanns playing it right?

Portuguese police consult clairvoyants


01 June 2007

04 June 2007

06 June 2007

McCanns forced to defend themselves

Mothers to name and shame absent fathers


07 June 2007

We’re good parents not suspects, say McCanns

How to spot a liar: tell it backwards


09 June 2007

‘Madeleine’ call made from Argentina phone

10 June 2007

Parents fear they must return without Maddy

…yesterday Mr McCann, a medical consultant from Rothley, in Leicestershire, said: ”The time has come for a contingency plan.” Seated next to his wife in the flat on the Algarve where they have been staying with their two-year-old twins, Amelie and Sean, Mr McCann said: ”We will not give up, but there will be a different way of doing it. I can see myself having to go back to the UK to meet with people, it is just more efficient to do things over there.

”It will be very, very hard. The last time I was back, I couldn’t even go into the house. I found it hard enough going to Rothley.” Mrs McCann admitted she would prefer to stay in Portugal. ”I feel very close to Madeleine here,” she said. ”She could actually be further away from here than she is from the UK but I feel emotionally close to her here. People have told me I could do the same, if not more, back in the UK, but I can’t face leaving here.”

The couple agreed, however, that they need a break. ”We can’t keep doing the same thing week after week. The coverage will dwindle away,” Mr McCann said.

11 June 2007

Maddy detective accused of beating suspect

13 June 2007

Letter claims Madeleine is ‘buried under rocks’

14 June 2007

McCanns blast newspaper over tip off

15 June 2007

Police abandon scrubland search for Madeleine

16 June 2007

Parents face total ban on smacking

The EU’s strength is its diversity

17 June 2007

19 June 2007

Fathers choose children over careers

30 June 2007

McCann ‘extortion’ couple in court

“Police began to investigate them after getting information that they had tried to contact Madeleine’s parents to collect a reward.”


01 July 2007

Glasgow attack: Police explode car at hospital

02 July 2007

Madeleine’s parents leave Algarve resort

03 July 2007

Screaming fans at Harry Potter premiere

07 July 2007

10 July 2007

Madeleine McCann suspect questioned again

11 July 2007

13 July 2007

Madeleine McCann friends confront suspect

16 July 2007

Harry Potter to help in search for Madeleine

18 July 2007

Tabloid Portuguese newspaper Diario de Noticias has claimed that police have intercepted emails and phone calls between the McCanns and their friends in recent weeks which “prove” the theory Madeleine was killed inside the apartment.The same paper claimed that it was specks of Madeleine’s blood found by British sniffer dogs this week inside her apartment bedroom.

However the samples have only just been sent to a laboratory in Birmingham for tests, which could take up to two weeks to process.Mrs Oldfield said: “They are throwing mud at us and we are not able to defend ourselves. It does not help to find Madeleine. We just have to hope the investigation progresses to a point where something concrete comes out of it.”She added that she still believed it was an abduction.

“There would only be a small window for somebody to do it (abduct Madeleine) but presumably if somebody had been watching our movements then it would have been possible,” she said.Mrs Oldfield was with her husband Matthew, a doctor, as part of a group of seven adults the McCanns were holidaying with.The others dining on May 3 were the McCanns, Jane Tanner, Russell O’Brien, David and Fiona Payne and another person who has not been named, but is thought to be the mother of one of those present.

Kate and Gerry McCann said regular visits were made to check on the children as they ate 100 yards away from them at a tapas restaurant on the Ocean Club complex.But the exact chronology of the night has never been revealed.Some reports have claimed there were “discrepancies” between the times the group members had given to police on what happened on the night she disappeared.Mrs Oldfield said this was not correct, adding: “When we gave a statement to police in Portugal we were told it is all confidential. We have stuck to that. We are all good citizens and have integrity.”

British police are continuing to carry out a review of evidence in Portugal and specialist sniffer dogs have been searching beaches and scrubland areas.

Meanwhile, Mr and Mrs McCann continued to campaign for Madeleine’s plight and wider issues of child protection.Mrs McCann, speaking on Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour, called for a Europe-wide “quick response” system to react to reports of child abductions.She said that abductions were more common than many parents realised.

Britain’s child protection measures, such as the sex offenders’ register and system of Criminal Record Bureau checks, should be enforced across the continent, she said.She added that the United States – which her husband visited a few weeks ago – seemed far ahead in its ability to respond to child kidnappings.Citing statistics from the Protect American’s Children organisation, Mrs McCann said that during 2002-03 there were 1,000 attempted child abductions in England and Wales. She said 100 children were successfully kidnapped by strangers.

“It’s really important that parents know these things and take extra care,” she said. “Systems need to be in place across Europe for a quick-response for children that have gone missing. All countries in Europe should have a sex offenders register and Criminal Bureau Checks in place.“It is important that the general public are informed about the scale of the problem. I was horrified of things that I have learned about since this happened.”


09 August 2007

Madeleine parents ‘should leave Portugal’

“People are thinking this is not a safe place to bring their children and have cancelled holidays here.”

Mr and Mrs McCann have declared repeatedly they do not want to return home without Madeleine and have stayed in Praia da Luz as the investigation continues. But family friends now fear they are being “hounded out”.

Mr and Mrs McCann today stopped using the creche at the Ocean Club, where they have dropped off twins Sean and Amelie to be looked after every day since the disappearance of Madeleine.They are said to be aware that it is now causing disruption to other families using the facility because of the increased presence of Portuguese media.

Mr McCann has also not updated his daily blog on the campaign website – www.findmadeleine.com.The family are said to want to keep a low profile “until the storm blows over”.


10 August 2007

Madeleine’s parents shouldn’t ‘over-protect’

Madeleine McCann’s mother: ‘Don’t bully us’

Yesterday some locals called for “those bloody McCanns” to leave Portugal and they were asked to remove their twins from a crêche after it was repeatedly surrounded by Portuguese journalists.In a frank interview last night, the couple hit back. Mrs McCann said: “It’s sticks and stones. We will never go through anything worse than being parted from Madeleine. We will not be leaving or be forced out. I am not prepared to be bullied into doing something that I don’t want to.

“This speculation and the actions of the Portuguese press has been hurtful, intrusive and disrespectful to our other two children. The press here have badly overstepped any reasonable line.”A frantic week of claim and counter-claim has followed revelations that British sniffer dogs had uncovered new evidence – including specks of blood, hairs and fibres – in the bedroom where Madeleine disappeared on May 3. The Portuguese press turned on the family and their friends, claiming that the three-year-old was killed inside the apartment.

Mr McCann said: “There has been a lot of speculation and clearly there has been a shift in the investigation. But we do not know of any new evidence to suggest that Madeleine is not alive.”The key thing is the lack of any evidence during the initial investigation of serious harm coming to her. That is what has given us hope.”

The couple are determined to remain in Praia da Luz as the investigation continues, but Mrs McCann admitted to feeling “trapped” by the current storm. On Tuesday, she could not get out of the Mark Warner Ocean Club crêche with her two-year-old twins, Sean and Amelie, because of a scrum of Portuguese journalists. They were asked yesterday to stop using it. Mr McCann said: “Mark Warner has been incredibly supportive of us throughout but they have come under a bit of pressure and we agreed not to go for a while. They offered us alternative arrangements.”


11 August 2007

Vigil for Madeleine after 100-day search

Police admit Madeleine McCann might be dead

‘Mass exodus’ of holidaymakers


12 August 2007

McCanns ‘heartened’ not to be suspects

Madeleine McCann search gets nasty

There is no denying that the McCanns’ relationship with the Portuguese press and police has become increasingly strained. Last week’s confrontation was just one more example of how the couple, who were swamped with sympathy by the townspeople of Praia da Luz in the early months of the hunt for their daughter, are now under attack from that same community….The all-too-sad truth is that the wealth of goodwill that once buoyed the McCanns is turning against them. It is an open secret in Praia da Luz that, while in public they never criticise the Portuguese police investigation, in private the couple have their doubts about the manner in which Guilhermino Encarnação is heading the inquiry.His blunders have been well documented and the McCanns prefer to deal with Luis Neves, the third detective involved in the case. Even Encarnação’s own officers joke that he “prefers long lunches to working”.

The harsh fact is that the public’s compassion is fickle. “People here are finding it all a little tiresome,” says Sheena Rawcliffe, the managing director of The Resident, the town’s English language weekly magazine.“Of course our hearts go out to them. But people are asking the blunt question: why did they leave the children alone? Why remain here? The McCanns need closure, but so, too, do the people of Luz. A backlash has begun and I believe it could get ugly before long.”Local business people continue to pay lip service to recognising the trauma suffered by the McCanns, but they point out that the sustained media eye on the resort is harming them. Hotels, restaurants and bars say takings are down and blame it on the negative image the town has.“The feeling is that they have outstayed their welcome,” one said. “Everyone here has contributed to the find Madeleine fund but it bothers us that it is not a charity. And that is because it is solely aimed at one child. Only when her case is resolved would the money go towards other missing children.”

The McCanns, of course, see things differently. “I am not sure I will ever be able to return to our Rothley home,” Kate admits. “I feel to leave Luz would be to abandon Madeleine. I can never, ever do that. “She insists she will not be bullied into leaving. But she must also be aware that the expatriate community has also become increasingly angry about the vilification of Robert Murat, the only suspect in the case.“The McCanns are attracting criticism because they refuse to divulge the exact details and timings of what happened on the night Madeleine disappeared.They are doing so because, under Portuguese law, such information would be prejudicial to the inquiry.But hasn’t the time now come for them to flout the law and clarify these details – in the hope that it somehow might help the investigation.Who is going to prosecute them for breaking a privacy law when their child’s welfare is at stake?”


15 August 2007

Madeleine sniffer dogs detect scent of body


17 August 2007

Madeleine McCann’s siblings told she is missing

18 August 2007

McCann twins told: Madeleine is missing

19 August 2007

Madeleine McCann parents to leave Portugal

20 August 2007

New suspect in Madeleine McCann case

The Public Prosecutor’s Office, which directs the police inquiry, signed a series of documents on Friday, ordering the PJ in Faro to put detectives on standby and authorising search warrants at locations that may be linked to the disappearance of Madeleine 109 days ago.

Staff from the Ocean Club complex, where Madeleine disappeared on May 3, will be also be re-interviewed today. A police source said: “We are re-interviewing several witnesses in order to clarify details that may be relevant to the new line of inquiry in light of facts we have found.”Pamela Fenn, 70, who lives in the apartment above where the McCanns were staying, and her niece, who is flying to Portugal from the UK, will be among those spoken to.Mrs Fenn has said that in the weeks leading up to Madeleine’s disappearance she scared off an intruder in her apartment.

There was no apparent sign of a break-in and it is thought the man may have had a key to let himself into the flat. She will be making a formal statement today at police headquarters in the city of Portimao. There was also another burglary in the complex a few weeks before in which police also suspected the intruder had a key.Mrs Fenn’s niece was staying with her aunt in the week that the McCanns were on holiday. She saw a suspicious-looking man hanging around the McCanns’ apartment about the time Madeleine vanished.

21 August 2007

Madeleine McCann’s parents told not to leave


22 August 2007

Complaints over Maddy ad rejected

24 August 2007

Paedophile is spared jail

26 August 2007

McCanns call for media obsession to end

27 August 2007

McCanns frustrated over Madeleine inquiry

30 August 2007

Madeleine McCann chief detective sacked

images


*Sources

The Telegraph 2007 Archive

Madeleine McCann’s disappearance: A timeline – Sky News

Madeleine McCann disappearance timeline – The Telegraph

What happened on the day Madeleine disappeared? – The Guardian

When did Madeleine McCann go missing? The timeline of her disappearance – Daily Star

Madeleine McCann: A timeline of her disappearance – Cosmopolitan

Madeleine McCann disappearance: a timeline of events – Heart

Timeline changed in hunt for missing girl – rte

Timeline of events in Madeleine McCann disappearance ‘changed’, say UK police – Daily Motion

BLOGS/FORUMS:

Question about a detail (timelines)

SEARCHING FOR MADELEINE THE TIME LINE IN PICTURES

madmyst


 

The First 3 Reviews for TWO FACE ANNIHILATION

The last two books of the series of 7 [as it stands now] were extremely difficult to research and write. Book 7 was probably the most difficult of all. This is because one is relying entirely on the audio as the primary source for the information.

7013594-6460887-image-a-2_1543960164358dr-phil-5CHRISTOPHER-WATTS-02.18.19-Redacted-600x800

On the one hand, it’s excellent material because what we are listening to is exactly what the three members of law enforcement heard, plus minus some white noise here and there. There’s also a lot to work with – over four hours’ worth.

If you felt frustrated listening to one of the Rzucek lawyers conveying his impressions to Dr. Phil, you weren’t alone. We wanted to know exactly what Watts said, and also how he said it. The tone. The pitch. The context. Most important, the psychology. Is it believable. Does what he’s saying actually make sense, or does it conform to another pattern…?

And then the Rzuceks provided their impressions. They were touching, and while we felt sympathetic to the family, the two-part show  never provided the kind of deep diving psychological analysis Watts’s Second Confession really needed.

On the other hand, not having video and sometimes having the audio muffled or cut out was frustrating. The chronology of Agent Tammy Lee’s 29-page CBI Report and the audio aren’t an absolute match, which is interesting. It shows while the law enforcement trio went to the prison with specific questions, they didn’t necessarily ask all of them in a specific order, nor did they get their answers in a prescribed order either. This makes for a chaotic narrative, and it was my job to unravel it and rearrange it.

Transcribing audio is hard work, but worth it, as I think readers have discovered.

Fullscreen capture 20190418 133749

Chris Watts: Are Expert Psychologists Qualified to Prognosticate on Criminal Psychology?

At 2.11 in the clip, two expert psychologists from Colorado are shown a clip of Chris Watts sobbing into his hands with his father’s arm over his shoulder, and the two agents [both with their hands against their chins] looking on silently off his opposite shoulder.

The assessment of the psychologist is triumphant:

“It’s up! [Smiles]. He’s caught. Now he’s upset. Because he’s caught.This is the first time you see emotion…Because now he’s caught. You didn’t see emotion when his family was killed, you see emotion now that he’s caught…”

At the time Watts was “confessing” to Shan’ann murdering the kids [in the house] and himself reacting to this in a mindless rage. Are the agents in the room also thinking:

It’s up! He’s caught. Now he’s upset. Because he’s caught. 

Fullscreen capture 20190415 114540

If the agents were thinking that, why go back and interview him a second time for almost five hours?

And clip goes on to say “why?” will likely never be answered. With that attitude, why even bring in psychologists? The “we’ll never know why” cop out is kindergarten true crime analysis. The assessment that a criminal is “evil” is schoolyard level criminal analysis.

It’s hardly a case of never. It’s more a case of applying one’s mind on a particular for weeks, months or longer on end. Put some effort in. Study the case. Think about the case. When one does that the why becomes clearer, if not entirely obvious.

Fullscreen capture 20190415 115616

There’s also a postscript calling Watts a “master manipulator”. Yes, the guy you saw swaying next to the television and not fooling anyone there, apparently did fool someone.

chris-watts-via-weld-county-district-attorneys-office6954440-6455827-image-m-5_1543858159762Fullscreen capture 20190415 1206083zclq65al5effas5p2iecosdei

I discuss and analyze the psychology of Chris and Shan’ann Watts in detail in the TWO FACE series, as this latest review of Book #7 illustrates:

Fullscreen capture 20190416 130302

Chris Watts claims “Rage” was the operative emotion that made him wipe out his family. But this is what a genuine “Rage” Annihilation looks like…

The word “rage” appears only twice in the 29-page CBI Report documenting Chris Watts’ Second Confession. The first instance is at the top of page 8:

Fullscreen capture 20190414 213346

The second instance is at the bottom of page 12:

Fullscreen capture 20190414 213621

I won’t be doing any long lectures explaining why the “just snapped” scenario is bogus and bullshit, because that would be repeating tired arguments fielded months ago. If you haven’t read them yet, be my guest.

“Chris Watts Just Snapped”

Chris Watts describes the reason he killed Shan’ann Watts: “I just snapped” [AUDIO Part 1+2]

In the Discovery Documents there are a couple of additional instances of “snapping”, “losing it” and “rage”:

Fullscreen capture 20190414 214326Fullscreen capture 20190414 213957Fullscreen capture 20190414 214301Fullscreen capture 20190414 214317

Although Watts tries to paint a portrait of himself as overcome with emotion, and the crime as a crime of passion, we had virtually zero evidence of anyone else – including Shan’ann – experiencing Watts’ rage. There’s no sign of it at work, nor in his background. There’s none of it in his marriage, and his mistress never mentions any anger issues either. On the contrary, if anyone is somewhat petulant or irritable it’s not Watts, it’s either Kessinger or his wife. That’s not necessarily a compliment to Watts, to say that he was extremely cool and even crushed in on himself. This may have made him seem suave and mild-mannered to Kessinger, but pathetic, and meek – at times – to Shan’ann, who was more extroverted than he was.

The Watts Family Murders weren’t committed in a fit of rage. Premeditation by definition takes the emotional dimension out of a crime and replaces it with cool, calculated, precise execution, disposal of bodies and covering up of the crime scene.

46667966_1171652959653867_6822995070879268864_n

If anything, both Shan’ann and Kessinger describe Watts as sweet-natured, Shan’ann realizing he was a “really nice guy” because he let her lay in his lap for 2.5 hours on a drive back from Myrtle Beach. Kessinger, in her exclusive with the Denver Post said although she barely knew him, he was a good listener. So the whole rage monster deal doesn’t work even if Watts would like it to. It’s just not who he is.

So what does an authentic ANNIHILATION driven by rage look and feel like?

Well, like this:

Phoenix man who suspected wife of an affair kills her and 2 kids, spares youngest: police – Fox News

Fullscreen capture 20190414 215726

Fox News describes the Smith Shooting appropriately as a murder rampage.

The Smith case involves the murder of his two children [while sparing the third] and two adults, one of them a random bystander who happened to be at his brother’s apartment when Smith arrived there. Two other people were shot at the apartment, but the 47-year-old woman and 33-year-old man both survived. Smith’s shooting arguably qualifies for the definition of a Mass Shooting since four people were killed indiscriminately and spontaneously.

Although the Smith Shooting more closely resembles the “He just snapped” scenario, it’s obvious he didn’t just snap out of the blue either. The trigger was the notion that his own brother had betrayed him with his wife, and vice versa. There also seems to be a religious aspect, with Smith feeling emasculated not only as man but by what he may have felt justified regarding as “forces of evil”. The point is, it’s reductionist to boil down in a crime like the Smith Shooting as motivated by rage and a man snapping. That said, the Smith Shooting more closely fits that definition [if one insists on applying it] than the Watts case does.

This begs the question – if rage wasn’t the operative emotion in the Chris Watts case, what was?

What was it?

I don’t want to argue that zero anger or zero frustration was at issue here. There had to have been. Murder itself is a violent, aggressive act. But we’re trying to make the case for some other emotion – far more significant than anger – being the operative feeling in Watts’ murderous and mendacious heart.

What was it?

SdUMki85r4wCGTuY5mjH5kFtKFrqJrn7VHlOCNNQGcD4Ao5fMvkgz4krYjBf1RvA

New “Last Photo” of JonBenet Ramsey has just been released – and there’s a problem…

Since January, since the lawsuit the Ramseys launched against CBS was settled [on January 5th, 2019 to be precise], there’s definitely been an uptick in Ramsey-related news. On January 9th, the Ramseys defamation go-to-guy – Lin Wood – gave an interview admonishing the “fake news” media. Then two days after Wood’s “fake news” comments there was news of an old suspect resuscitating their confessions [like Gary Oliva], that started as early as January 11th.

By February Gary Oliva’s confession was still rolling across the world’s media landscape, making waves in the United Kingdom.  By the end of March, Gary Oliva was still the talk of the town three months after the CBS settlement. Not a bad run of distracting coverage to drown out the settlement narrative, was it?

Now, in April, we have a documentary featuring none other than John Ramsey himself. It’s not just a vacuous documentary either. 23 years after the unsolved murder of his daughter, for the first time ever, this photo of JonBenet Ramsey has been publicly released.

Fullscreen capture 20190413 194821

There’s a serious problem with this image.

Before addressing what it is, let’s have a look at the other images that were either previously the “Last Photo” of the slain beauty queen, or otherwise photos taken shortly before her death.

The image/s above was/were previously recognized and accepted as the “Last Photo” of JonBenet. It was taken a fair length of time before her death, fairly early on Christmas Day morning [note the background is still in darkness]. JonBenet was murdered about 18 hours after this image was taken, and her body discovered in the basement of the Ramsey home by her father another 13-or-so hours after that.

A derivative impression of the last image was subsequently used as the cover for Paula Woodward’s book We Have Your Daughter, but with Patsy edited out.

A review in the Daily Camera at the time was pretty frank about where Woodward’s true allegiance and objectivity lay:

[Woodward] signals an intention to shoot down “erroneous assumptions” to repeatedly cast doubt on the prevailing police narrative of the murder. Given the author’s access to the couple’s private journals as well as the cooperation of their attorneys, it’s no spoiler to say the book is firmly in the Ramsey corner.

Other photos taken that morning including these, including one with nine-year-old Burke beside his younger sister. If there are few photos of JonBenet on that last day there are even fewer images of Burke floating around.

On December 23rd, these images were taken:

In reality, the last photos taken of JonBenet in the Ramsey home were these:

A close-up photo just prior to the autopsy was taken of the  little girl’s hand:

But let’s not quibble over semantics. By Last Photo what is meant is the last photo of JonBenet when she was alive.

What is the serious problem with this image?

Fullscreen capture 20190413 194821

23 years after the unsolved murder of his daughter, for the first time ever, this photo of JonBenet Ramsey has been publicly released, presumably by John Ramsey himself. Why has it taken 23 years to release the last photo of his daughter? And if it’s only been released to the public and the media now, what about law enforcement?

The full implications of what the Last Photo represents are analyzed to completion in Christmas Star, available now.

 

Lawyer Neighbour Claims She Saw McCanns “Airing” Their Renault Scenic Rental – At Night

In detective Goncalo Amaral’s book Truth of the Lie he doesn’t spend a lot of time on the subject of a neighbour who came forward and said [anonymously] that she thought she saw the McCanns “ventilating” their rental vehicle. Including at night.

Near the end of his chapter “The Hypothesis of Death is Considered” Amaral makes the following passing remark:

Later, I am brought the witness statement of a neighbour, according to whom, the McCanns left their car boot open all the time. For Gerry’s brother-in-law, the bad smell was explained by the fact that the McCanns transported their bins in it. As for the blood, it had been left by a piece of meat fallen out of a shopping bag. Kate’s cousin explained that the unpleasant smells were due to the little ones’ dirty nappies.

None of that stands up to scrutiny faced with the reactions of these dogs, who are thoroughly trained to detect only blood and cadaver odours.

Amaral provides more detail in the documentary based on his book, and the neighbour also comes forward [though her face is not shown] where she discusses what she thought she saw. This aspect is covered from 4:20 in the clip below.

The neighbour, a lawyer [whom Amaral refers to as a “juror” in the translation] seems to be a credible witness. One of her more memorable statements is this one:

 “I drive down this street every day to turn my car around at that end and every time that I passed the house and I looked at the car, and the car always had an open boot door, day or night. I often passed at night and always verified it. It was a fact, I reported it and that was it”.

What you won’t often see, or hear about, is a report published in the Daily Express on 14 September 2007, which appeared to show the cadaver dogs tracked cadaver odor from Apartment 5A on a direct route to the coast.

Fullscreen capture 20190413 135201Fullscreen capture 20190413 135233

Fullscreen capture 20190413 152934

The Daily Express sensationally described this 1 mile beeline route from the hotel to the coast as “The Trail of Death”.

img

But other international media reported on the same findings.

indicios

The cover of the Daily Express that same day trumpeted MADELEINE WAS ‘KILLED BY SLEEPING PILLS’.

SE4

The Telegraph reported on the same claim on the same day.

Guilhem Battut, an investigative reporter for the French tabloid France Soir, said Portuguese police had given prosecutors a file detailing how they thought Madeleine had died. Battut – an experienced journalist who has worked on a number of major inquiries – claims police believe that evidence found in the McCanns’ hire car will “prove that the little girl had ingested medicines, without doubt sleeping pills, in large quantities”.

A source at the newspaper claimed: “We are not simply repeating rumours carried in other papers. This is not a theory, but a fact contained in hard evidence in the hands of the Portuguese authorities. “It is all very well putting theories and opinions forward, but in the end this case will be decided on evidence. As journalists, we have been trying to establish what evidence is available.”

DNA evidence which has reportedly been found in the hire car includes hair, blood and bodily fluids which match Madeleine’s. Police are said to want to examine the vehicle again. It is currently being kept in a safe place by the family who are considering having their own tests carried out on it as they strive to prove their innocence.Portuguese police are said to be drawing up a list of 40 new questions that they want to put to Mrs McCann. But British forensic experts expressed doubts over the claim.

Alan Baker, of the independent forensic science organisation Bericon, said: “These samples are likely to be far from ideal. If it is just a smear or dried deposit you could detect the drug but not how much.”Jamie150907_468x362

Last night friends of the family dismissed the latest speculation. Gerry McCann reportedly told a friend: “There are large craters in every one of these theories, in these ludicrous accusations.’ “As far as Kate and I are concerned there is no evidence to suggest that Madeleine is dead. We are 100 per cent together on this, not one grain of suspicion about each other.”

A close friend of Mrs McCann’s said: “She is a gentle mother who loves her children very much.”

An article in the February 2008 edition of Vanity Fair notes Kate McCann’s explanation for why the cadaver dogs sensed cadaver odour on the key fob of the rental vehicle. It was because Kate McCann had been around cadavers just before her trip to the Algarve.

article-2620513-1D8C161600000578-729_306x500

Fullscreen capture 20190413 155721

The Daily Express six months earlier had been more specific, reporting that Kate had apparently said she’d come into contact with six corpses “in the weeks” before the holiday. Of course the car was also hired weeks after the incident.

Fullscreen capture 20190413 160149

More information: OFFICIAL INQUIRY FILES and DOCUMENTS
Renault Scenic 59-DA-27

Errrm…I have a few questions about the “Disappearance of Madeleine McCann” Wikipedia Page

I suppose the most obvious question is: who wrote it? In the list of 298 citations, 50 references refer to Summers & Swan, the authors of Looking For Madeleine.  Summers & Swan are also the main narrators of the recent £20 million 8-part Netflix documentary series on the McCann case. It’s strange than 1 in 6 citations refer to only one narrative of the case when there are at least half a dozen others.

In the shorter list of Works Cited, Summers & Swan appears again as one of 14 “authoritative” works on the case, another being Kate McCann’s book.

Now we already know the disgraced British PR firm Bell Pottinger has – in the past – been implicated in editing Wikipedia pages to their own specifications. One example is explicated in this TimesLive article from July 2017: Bell Pottinger’s wicked Wiki ways.

Extracts of the article include:

In 2012, 10 user accounts linked to Bell Pottinger were stopped from making edits to Wikipedia pages after an investigation by British journalists revealed the firm’s evasion of ethical guidelines set out by Wiki founder Jimmy Wales. He was quoted by the BBC at the time as saying he was “highly critical of their ethics” and began an investigation into what appeared to be the firm’s manipulation of Wikipedia content.

This was after the Bureau of Investigative Journalists caught Bell Pottinger executives on hidden a camera bragging about, among other things, having a team that “sorts” Wikipedia pages. In December 2011, Bell Pottinger executives were caught out by journalists who secretly filmed and recorded them boasting about their political influence over the British prime minister and their proficiency at “dark arts”.

Bell Pottinger was involved in providing PR to Kate and Gerry McCann, as well as Oscar Pistorius and the infamous Gupta Brothers [through Oakbay Investments].

Fullscreen capture 20190412 111316

Fullscreen capture 20190412 112541

Leveson Inquiry: as it happened November 23

Authors in Madeleine McCann documentary living in Waterford believe ‘her abduction was planned’

Madeleine McCann: ‘I listened for 15 seconds and knew they were innocent’

Fullscreen capture 20190412 114134

Netflix-Maddie-McCann-1590359

Coonrod: Did she have the kids with her last night? Chris Watts: Yes…

At 41:25 in the clip below Chris Watts tries to imply that Shan’ann was with the kids “last night”. Then he corrects himself, telling Coonrod he was with the kids all weekends. He hastily throws in an alibi, while he’s at it: he took them to a birthday party Sunday.

During my initial research into the case, before information emerged about the birthday party, I thought it was possible the children had been killed on Saturday, or even earlier. This shows the importance not only of the party, but Watts taking photos at the party showing evidence of them being alive and him looking after them and entertaining them.

Also worth watching, at 40:43 Coonrod asks Watts if his kids take any medication. If Watts used 80mg Oxycodone to drug and kill his daughters, this question should have made him nervous. Does he look nervous?

Notice also how he role plays reaching for the neck area while describing the pharmacodynamics of the active ingredients…

« Older posts Newer posts »